Skip to content
optimize for strength optimize for strength

Optimize for STRENGTH with Simplify3D & innovatiQ 3D Printers

There are many characteristics to consider when optimizing for strength.  Obviously, this is highly dependent upon the material properties of your filament.

It is also highly dependent on the number of shells in the part, the infill shape, and the infill density.  Typically, the biggest bang for the buck is the number of shells in the part...this is due to moment of inertia...similar to the reason that an I-beam is strong, while also being lightweight.  Experimentally, we have found the standard rectilinear infill pattern to be the most strong. We rarely print with anything over 80% infill, and our standard infill is 20%.

Finally, for extra strength the parts can be printed slightly hotter (to increase inter layer adhesion) or the parts can be post-processed with a controlled annealing process.

 

 

Want to learn how advanced manufacturing can support your business?

More You Might Like

Haas Demo Day Recap: Real Shop-Floor Additive Workflows

The big message from Haas Demo Day was simple. Your shop output is limited by the slowest step in your process. Additive helps remove those slow steps. We showed real examples where printed parts kept machines running, made casting faster, improved automation reliability, and eliminated labor-heavy masking. This is how 3D printing drives throughput and protects uptime.

PODCAST: How 3DChimera Uses 3D Printing and 3D Scanning to Solve Manufacturing Challenges

Alex Hussain, CEO of 3DChimera, joined the LIFT podcast to share how his team is making 3D printing and 3D scanning work in real-world manufacturing. The discussion covers practical ways to use additive manufacturing in demanding environments, from small batch production to on-the-spot problem solving.

Connecting Multiple AMS Units to the H2D? No Hub Required.

One of the most common questions we get about the Bambu Lab H2D is: “Do I need an AMS Hub or buffer to run multiple AMS units?” The answer is simple: No.
Back to top